See more imagesHighly rated by customers for:
Sandeep Posted
Had this TV for over a month now.Using it for Gaming and Netflix etc. Good picture quality. But the connectivity is not good . I had to reset twice the TV as the airplay stopped responding. LG does not have HBO go which i did not know before buying this TV. Struggling to cast on Youtube as well. I get two options in cast list for TV and neither works. LG really need to work on a newer update for the OS
StephenE Posted
Takes a whole day to update the software when the disc is put in the PlayStation for the first time
BradleyK Posted
Great game but if you order from Best Buy and have the game shipped to you, it will most likely show up with the disc loose inside. I'm not happy about it. That's after it happening with the last SEVERAL games I've ordered from them. To the point that I'm no longer ordering from Best Buy online.
MOHAMMADI Posted
This game is good it is good but it’s not all that if it being honest that’s just my opinion
TF1981 Posted
After all the hype, I was pretty excited to start on this one. Excellent graphics, cinematics, and open world designs. Very realistic and detailed. That being said, it moves a little more slowly than I'd like. I don't like having to stop to eat all the time, or have to remember to feed the horse. They may as well make you have to use the bathroom every few hours. Kind of mundane. I like realistic in some aspects, this was just an irritant for me. So, instead of binge playing the way I normally would with something like a GTAV or a FF, I find myself playing for an hour here or there, and not really missing it when I'm not playing... So yea, great game but also disappointed. I still would buy it, but I wish I had waited until the price came down on this one.
Conception515 Posted
By no means do I think this is a BAD game, but it's certainly the most disappointing AAA title ever made, in my opinion. The first RDR is one of my ten favorite games of all time, and I still pick it up to play to this day, almost a decade later. I was so excited about this game, that perhaps it couldn't live up to its own hype, but unfortunately, if crumbles under the weight of its ambition. This is more of a horse riding simulator than an actual video game; there are some outstanding characters and voice acting, but the action is clunky and dull for the most part. This is a must play for those who want to get the backstory on Dutch's gang, but unless you want to spend all of your time brushing a horse, taking a bath, and walking SLOWLY through camps, stay away.
Ebiru2387 Posted
I love Rockstar games. Most of the time their titles are well polished masterpieces! That said, RDR2 is too much of one. The game is fun and has a LOT to do. But what it tries to grasp for in realism, it loses in flow. Before you know it 5 hours passes by and all you did was hunt and play poker. I wish it would have found ways to improve the flow of gameplay. That and online is still a cash grab which is why i gave this game 3 stars. Tbh...wait for a sale!
TerriG Posted
I think this game has quite the learning curve in my opinion. Even strange just a small bit off the path during the mission equals failed. Very little room for mistakes. Now if you do stay with it and get used to all the buttons sequences all the stuff you can do etc, then the game might be actually enjoyable if you enjoy gigantic worlds and tons of side quests along the way. I was hoping it was more of the story based game that had side quests that you could do but most of the time I'm left not knowing what to do and end up doing the wrong thing and bad things happening other words dying, failing the mission. If you can hang with it, and take time to learn all the controls perfectly and have the patience then this game might actually be good. This review is not based on the online part of it which I think is an actually a separate game in of itself. Get ready because it's going to be hard at first but maybe just maybe the reward would be good if you can handle all this and have the patience.
Patkeav Posted
The environments are beautiful and the level of realism is high. But the controls are a little janky. I don't see why you need to 'hold X' when all you're doing is riding a wagon down the road, or why when you loot a dead body there's a 6-second animation of the player character digging through each of the body's pockets. Though I'm told these kinds of mechanics are standard in Rockstar games so if you're used to them, then you'll have a blast.
Chad Posted
The game is great....However, there's a few things that are really disappointing. No REAL implementation of fast travel. I love the immersion of the world, and the random events you can come across, but sometimes I don't feel like riding 15-20 minutes to go to a far away mission. I timed it one time, and it took 13 minutes to get from one mission to the next. That's a little excessive when that will be your entire game experience. After upgrading the camp enough you can unlock one way fast travel...WITHOUT your horse, making it a long trek all over again. Arthur is likable, but I liked John and his story much more. The mask is a little annoying when committing crimes. It seems that even if you put it on way outside of town, change clothes, keep it on, change clothes when you get away.....you still get a bounty...what exactly is it doing, then? the motion can feel a little clunky sometimes. Overall the story just isn't as engaging to me as RDR 1 was. I'm just honestly a little disappointed in this game. It's stunningly beautiful, it has a great HUGE, lived in world. It's just not engaging...for me... Sometimes I don't want to spend 15-20 minutes going one way to a mission. Sometimes I only have an hour to play and don't want 3/4 of that to be traveling from A-B
HappyDad Posted
From a technical standpoint this game sets the bar for other open world games. Story wise it's very well written. However, gameplay wise it's boring and a far cry from the first game. It's slow paced, the character and horse movement is wonky and seriously hinders enjoyment. The first game was much more fun to play than this one.
Justin Posted
I got the game on release. Pro: Beautiful work and action in certain missions Con: - 75% of the time your just on the horse going from point A to B then Back to A. - No fast travel - Story is really long. You send alot of time just doing nothing/missions about nothing.
Sonygamer Posted
I recommend you read non critic reviews of this game. It is very slow and does little to entice you to keep playing. Visually it is beautiful and it is clear the developers took time to make this a really in depth experience. However, it feels like you are doing chores too often and hardly having fun. The control scheme is awful: movement feels very clunky and difficult to manage especially while riding a horse. It’s easy to accidentally hit people and have the law sent after you. Looking for items or information across the menus is a nightmare, and further slows down an already slow game. I give the game 3 stars for the graphics and atmosphere but take two away due to the lack of fun and pace. I would not buy this until it is much cheaper.
Celticjugerknot Posted
Great game... Story is actually way awesome, too bad it didn’t transfer as well online! Rockstar is really dropping the ball here, online is lacking a lot of depth missions and story.... they are focusing more elsewhere than here
Derrick1979 Posted
I guess if you loved the first one then you know what to expect and will love this game as well. for someone like me the graphics were good and such but the game was very slow paced and the controls leave lots to be desired..
RossNoir Posted
I loved Red Dead Redemption 1 so much I went on a spaghetti western movie kick for nearly a year. RDR2 sounded like more fun but what I really feel like I was doing was riding a horse. Tapping and Tapping to get places. Now don't get me wrong, the entire game is drop dead gorgeous the voice cast, the soundtrack was good but oddly chosen at times and characters were great. It was just everything in between. I love exploring games but this felt empty of life in some places you'd expect more. And more life in the corners you don't expect it. All in all it wasn't a waste of time just not that great of a game. I left expecting more. Maybe I have always given RDR1 too much credit these years later. Not bad, but far less memorable than it's predecessor/sequel.
NintendoDude Posted
This game excels in the graphics and story department, but it's easy to get overwhelmed with so much area to explore and things to do. This game is ideal for single people with no social life.
John Posted
Ok so I’m a long time fan of rockstar games starting with the original ps1 GTA. RDR2 is indeed a good game but the only thing is that you really can’t enough this game without every 5-10 minutes running into a cut scene. Throughout the whole game you’re running into cut scenes and although you can skip them, you really don’t want to otherwise you’ll be lost in the story. This game pretty much reminds me of a soap opera that my mother would watch. Honestly it wouldn’t be so bad I’f it didn’t have so many cut scenes. Rockstar probably would’ve been better off turning this into a animation movie rather than a game.
Bowsette Posted
I kind fell for the hype, but this is pretty much any Rockstar game that came out Post-GTA4. It's a big budget title with clunky controls and repetitive mission types. The voice acting is phenomenal and the atmosphere is amazing. However the gameplay is dull and typical of any Rockstar game that came out after GTA4. I miss the days of GTA3/Vice City/San Andreas where it was just about having fun. Now it's all about trying to make things like a movie and forgetting about the gameplay.
JStan Posted
The game looks great but it gets pretty boring pretty quick. Fast travel would be great if more available. I would pass but if you get it cheap why not.