“Any valid reason to go with an A9 now instead of an A7R-III? Especially for doing wildlife / field shots in Florida using stuff like a 24-240mm lens.”
Answer This Question
1-3 of 3 Answers
I had the a7r3 as well for a short period of time. I found A9 to focus and hold better on a moving animal. More importantly with it 20 vs 10 fps you never miss any of the action shots. You then can pick the best where with the A7... you may have missed it. I had an a72 and A7s2 and the A9 is a far better camera. In instills a confidence in you that you will always capture that right shot. I feel the added cost was worth it.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I have both cameras. For the 24-240 lens, you might be better off with the A&RIII. The 24-240 lens is very slow and you can push the ISO higher on the A7RIII. I have the 24-240 lens and find the performance to be unacceptable for either camera. The 24-105 is a much better lens and you could crop pictures taken with either of these Sony cameras. I find the focus very slow for the 24-240 for each of these and wish I had returned the lens before it was too late.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Every reason. The a9 is a superior camera in that situation. 20 frames per second superior auto focus. Higher shutter.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.