Customer Ratings & Reviews

i think this is a good movie. i would recommend it to others.

I wish movies like this would have more alien action in the screen.

Slow moving, not much action! Good acting like the actors

Good movie, ending kinda to out there alien unexpected

It was slow at times and ending was not that great.

it was to slow moving and the end was not worth it

Not what I expected, I should have saved my money.

This movie was disappointing from beginning to end. The story line was bad and made no sense. Definitely suggest spending your money on something else.

I was expecting more for this suspense movie. Much of the movie was dragging. The characters were uninteresting and the plot was not engaging

I saw the first cloverfield and was very disappointed, this one was not as bad, but still not worth the buy. I bought it to watch on the plane.

This so called follow up of Cloverfield is not. Most of the time is spent watching a fat man keeping two so called people in a bomb shelter.

Terrible boring movie that couldn't keep my attention or my wife for that matter. Awful awful awful. Don't waste your money on it!

this movie start off real good but then it's like they didn't know what to do with it so it because the stupidest movie ever.

Not the best but the worst the first one was way better. Probably because it did not have john Goodman destroying everthing

The movie was not suspenseful or scary. It falls with the other predictable movies.

When I first heard of this movie, I felt that the inclusion of the Cloverfield name was just a not-so-clever marketing tool used to salvage an un-sellable film about a devious doomsday prepper. (Maybe it was--I guess we may never know). If JJ Abrams wanted to produce a Cloverfield anthology franchise, why didn't it continue with Super-8? *Giant shrug.* Before viewing a movie, there are two kinds of audience: those who highly anticipate a thoroughly enjoyable experience, and those with expectations ranging from neutral to negative. This time, I was in the latter camp, leaning more toward neutral. I was skeptical that Abrams was just trying to pull one over on audiences for a quick buck (though I'm sure his jaunt in the Star Wars universe landed him enough of those to keep him out of the poor house for awhile). Ultimately, to sum it up in a spoiler-free way, this was a fun movie to watch as long as you excuse the cliche that survivalists are always dangerous nut-job shut-ins with Norman Bates-like tendencies.

John Goodman and Mary Elizabeth Winstead give two of their best performances ever in this claustrophobic, intense drama. Dan Trachtenberg does a great job directing the small cast in a tight space. Video and audio are very good. A nice selection of bonus features are here including a commentary from the director and producer J. J. Abrams.

The whole movie takes place in a very confined space with only three actors, but does an extremely great job of it. It doesn't use cheap tricks to scare, but it a brewing intensity throughout that continues to build towards the end. The very end is iffy to get into, but the beginning more than enough makes up for it. That's high spoiler territory though, I think it's worth it though.

WOWA....loved this movie.John Goodman was outstanding ,as always.This was the perfect follow up to Cloverfield....I was so hoping they would make one.The drama and twisted way that Goodman portrayed his part was creepy and well done.I know by the ending that there WILL BE another Cloverfield and I can not wait....LOVED IT!!!!!!!!

John Goodman really takes it to another level in this movie. All 3 of the main characters do a good job, but he really stands out. I can't give too much away, somebody else probably already did, but you won't believe why he helps her when he didn't have to.