Customer Ratings & Reviews

great scanner for photos, I love that it scans both side of the photo at onetime so you don't loose any hand written names

This has done a good job of scanning the photos I've put through so far. The original scans look like good reproductions, but the enhanced pictures don't look that good on the screen. It scans quickly, but the output tray doesn't collect the pictures well. They sometimes wind up on the floor.

Does exactly what it says it will scans your photos at lightning speed. Shockingly good at how fast and jam free it has been. Expensive but very happy with the purchase.

Bought this unit Feb 2025, billed as a fast photo scanner. It is fast, it can scan both side of photo and paper. But as as a photo scanner it is terrible. It feeds thru well but the quality of the scan is only fair at best. Its not worth the price. I'm sorry I bought it.

This little machine is fast and I love the fact that it not only groups your photos into a folder name of your choice, but also names each photo with that file name as well.

I am a huge fan of this scanner, but there are issues with it... First, the good. This thing scans fast and with excellent quality. It's ability to auto-correct for color and dirt is great. I even auto-corrects if a picture gets pulled in at an angle. I will literally take a stack of mismatched sizes, textures, etc and process them almost always without a hitch... almost. The biggest problem with the scanner is the FastFoto software. It's buggy. For example, if you're scanning a pile of pictures and one misfeeds, the scan will pause and tell you there's a jam. Unfortunately, when you resume scanning, it may or may not have forgotten about the previous pictures it scanned. Sometimes it might forget the previous 1 or 2, other times it forgets about all of them and you have to start over. Another example is again if there is a misfeed, it keeps telling you to fix it and retry. But there's no way to abort it. Sometimes a picture just wont feed. Usually this is because for some reason the picture is triggering the multi-feed detector and it's aborting... even if there is only one picture loaded. When it gets in this predicament, it's stuck in an endless loop. The only option is to retry. And, if you think you're speedy enough to kit the "try again" button and then the cancel button before the loop cycles, you're rewarded with all pictures being lost from the entire batch. Yep -- canceling a scan doesn't just cancel the problem picture, it cancels the entire batch. So, if you've scanned 30 pics and the last one is causing trouble and you manage to hit the cancel button before it disappears, all 30 of the scans are lost and you have to start all over again. I think the root of these problems, besides bad software design, is the scanner's multi-feed detection system. There are some photos that for some reason trigger this detector and bring the whole project to a halt. And, there's no way to force it to continue when you know good and well there's only one photo loaded so it can't possibly be a multifeed. And this isn't with dirty, ragged pictures. I'm talking about pristine pictures with nice crisp edges. It's definitely more finicky than it needs to be. There really need to be an option to "force" it to continue. So far, I'm about 4000 scans in with this scanner and overall am very pleased with it, but I have to tell you, the user experience with the software can be a little frustrating.

Works very well and fast.This was a little difficult to set up. Had to find and install the drivers but it wouldn’t find the scanner. Figured out it required a usb-3.0 port instead of a standard usb port and then found it right away. Would have saved time if it specified that.

Excellent and Works great very fast and loads multiple photos

Great Item wish i boought along time ago. Works great.

This scanner is solid. Its sheet feed mechanism is remarkably robust. I have thrown a few highly questionable stacks of photos at it. They intermix sizes, paper stock weight and surface coating. The sheet feeder swallowed all but the most indigestible and did it without chewing them up. Epson discovered that slick, thick Polaroid prints needed special handling and rather than dropping the problem on users unadmitted, provided a solution for it. Our household wireless system is more complex than most, and as has been true for some other household equipment, Epson's one-button-connect scheme didn't work. Epson's inclusion of a USB wireless sign-up method worked flawlessly. And then I engaged the enemy. The first skirmish with Epson's FastFoto support software was minor. The photo display directory doesn't provide an option to track changes in the "scanned photo images" directory, a minor nuisance. The photo directory display update is extremely slow when saving to a thumb drive on the network, even on a desktop machine that is much faster than the usual installation. The directory update operation sped up when I moved the destination to a hard drive, but the real problem is that FastFoto smashes through the image file set completely update after every scan batch. Moreover, it provides nothing like the familiar File Explorer sort order or directory view presentations. Performance issues aside, File Explorer maintained the image file set more conveniently. The engagement expanded. I want to scan the contents of about 100 business envelopes, each of which contains between three and thirty photos. Envelope numbering begins at 100, so using a Settings > Organization > File Prefix Name value string of "100" produced a first file named "100_0001_a.jpg", as suggested by the example text just below the entry line. The file naming scheme was simple but adequate, so I unchecked the "Prompt me to describe each batch of photos before scanning" box. All was well until I made my first goof. I chose to delete a gaggle of inverted images and to pass the photos through the scanner again in the correct order, but first, I had to reset the file counter to 1. The file naming subsystem of the operator interface offers no obvious way to reset or override the appended image number, which is an amateur oversight. It tells me that no one in Epson's software or test groups ever used the scanner for real work. So, what to do? Renaming the file prefix to itself seemed to reset the counter until on envelope #66, it didn't. Thereafter, I tried and failed to reset the counter to 1 with several seedy tricks and the image number increased undaunted. This is a serious shortage. It also contradicts the helpful example given immediately below the entry line, which clearly shows that the image count after a file name prefix change will begin with '0001'. Finding a solution to the image counter problem consumed far too much time. I thought that the ever-increasing value might be in the registry, but I deliberately limited myself to 15 minutes, during which nothing credible came up. I then ripped FastFoto out as completely possible using Revo Uninistaller and reinstalled the latest download again. THE NEW INSTALLATION DID NOT RESET THE IMAGE COUNTER! Lacking some perverse evasion in the registry, the problem is either in the scanner itself or in an Internet link to a shadow Epson server somewhere. I have no control over either resource. (Epson's support site put me into a deceptive and useless circle of links.) My only option is to break my numbering scheme, which if it works, only adds to the waste of time I have already invested on Epson's problem. If a broken numbering scheme doesn't reset the image counter, I will have to write a script of some kind to ride herd on Epson's mess.

Easy to use so far and its doing what I expected to do. Slowly putting the photos on the external hard drive. Still haven't batch a lot of photos at the moment.

Really does correct old pictures. Have to use 2 formats, one for documents and one for photo. Once I got used to that it is great

The scanner is just OK. It did damage a few of my old photos that weren’t in the best shape to begin with. If you have perfectly printed photos then it does a great job. Found the auto tune for color wasn’t always the best also and just stayed with the original rather than the “edited” version. All in all I couldn’t justify the price for a mediocre result and returned the product.

This machine is little pricey but it's worth the price if one needs to digitize thousands of photos like me. I have boxes and boxes of 3x5 photos taken in the 1980s and early 1990s and this machine was able to scan them into my computer in less than 2 hours. As I scanned the originals, the machine could make a copy of the original and adjusted the color. The only downside is that it doesn't take thicker photo papers such as instant photo papers as they will get stuck in the machine and be considered as error. If you have a lot of instant photos and/or photos with something stuck to the back, a flat bed scanner is the way to go.

It was amazing and easy to use with over all saving space

We love this! It makes scanning so incredibly easy! We are scanning all our family photos to put digital format to give to all family members. This is a bargain.

Good product, damage free when unloading, and simple to operate.

This photo scanner is worth it's weight in gold. it scans old printed photos fast and high quality. This will make short work of over a thousand photos

Overall this has been a good scanner. It is very high speed but not if you need high quality. Overall I am happy with the quality but had to lower the speed to reach the quality I need. Also, the auto editing is a great feature. I have used many of the edited photos.

Still scanning family photos a little at a time. I also scanned a thousand page story I wrote long hand. I like how it scans both side at the same time.