Customer Ratings & Reviews

They don’t really work that good I have to push to take pics

Meta AI Gen 2 Glasses Strengths Classic Ray-Ban Design & Color Options The glasses retain the iconic Ray-Ban style, offering a timeless and socially acceptable look. Frame and lens color options align with traditional eyewear aesthetics, making them suitable for both professional and casual settings. Improved Battery Life Battery performance is stronger than earlier smart-glass iterations, supporting several hours of moderate AI interaction and casual media capture. For light daily use, endurance is adequate. (after 4 hours of heavy usage- using AI and taking pictures you have to charge them) Key Dislikes & Limitations Underpowered AI (PoorLama 4 Model) AI responses are often simplistic, occasionally misinterpret commands, and lack advanced contextual reasoning. Performance does not match expectations set by modern cloud-based large language models. Smartphone Dependency Core functionality requires a paired mobile device. The glasses do not operate as a truly standalone AI wearable, reducing autonomy and convenience. Poor Night Photography Low-light image quality is weak, producing grainy and low-dynamic-range results. Camera performance is noticeably inferior to contemporary smartphones. Limited Object Recognition While Driving The system struggles to reliably distinguish contextual elements in dynamic environments such as while driving. This reduces practical augmentation value and positions the feature as novelty rather than functional assistance. Bluetooth & Connectivity Instability intermittent connection drops, pairing inconsistencies, and occasional audio sync issues. Voice Command Inconsistency Voice recognition can struggle in noisy environments, limiting reliability in real-world settings. Limited App Ecosystem Third-party integration remains constrained, restricting broader productivity use cases. Comfort Considerations Th e nose bridge pressure or fit discomfort during extended wear. Overall Utility Perception While stylish and technically interesting, the glasses often feel more like a lifestyle novelty than a daily productivity essential. Bottom Line Meta AI Gen 2 Glasses succeed in aesthetic integration and incremental battery improvement. However, constrained AI capability, smartphone reliance, inconsistent connectivity, weak low-light imaging, and limited contextual awareness significantly reduce functional depth. At present,IMHO they are best suited for early adopters and technology enthusiasts rather than users seeking a mission-critical wearable AI assistant. I think I should have waited but will regift them to someone else.

The music and ability to google any answer in your ears at any time is pretty cool. But they die pretty quick and don’t record with 40% battery or less, which takes about 1-2 hours of recording a lot. I would have opted for the gen 2s but when I asked the difference between the two from multiple sales people all they tell you is about length of total battery and how the camera quality is less. I bought gen 2s for my son and you can’t even tell the difference between the pics quality from these 1080p and his 3000. So this review should give you more information than the guys selling them at least.

I love the glass with the exception of one thing, they cannot live stream, unlike the generation 1 ray ban metas. I was very disappointed as this was the reason I bought them, but they are better the and the gen 1 in every other metric, so if you don't care about live streaming, these are a great upgrade.

Very cool concept. Sound quality is very good unless you are outside with lots of ambient noise. The only problem is how glitchy the AI personal assistant (meta) is. I have restarted my glasses several times and i still have issues. Phone calls are great and video for POV is really cool. The translator is also a great idea but also needs work.

Over all not a bad product, the transition in the glasses was not that great. When you are driving they do not get dark. The glasses to have good speakers and also when talking in the phone its clear. The glasses are a bit to heavy for my liking. Maybe in the future when better tech is developed to not make them as heavy i will purchase again.

Battery life is about 4 hours of continuous use, could last up to 8 hours with minimal use. Picture and video quality is pretty good

The glasses part was okay, but the ai was just silly. It was gimmicky and not too useful, and everyone else can hear the audio when listening to music.

They're cool. I feel as though if I was a kid with something like this I would have a little bit more fun. They're decent. The meta feature isn't the best, but Gemini makes up for it with my phone

Decent product battery life was nothing like advertised. Enjoyable until your wearing them for 6 hours using them as sunglasses and they die and you can’t capture anything

Great video and sound. More like a GoPro than the hype.

Third pair, first pair the microphone stopped working and no one could hear me on calls. The second pair were stolen in transit and now waiting on the third pair

Ive had both gen 1s and gen 2s the quality is not that much of an improvement, honestly cant really tell the difference. Also the last time i used them i was having issues where i had to hard reset them like 3 times to finally get them to start recording.

I feel as though they’re too heavy in the pictures is not really clear

Glasses were useless to me due to the fact that I wear prescriptions. 500 for sub par glasses then another 500 for transition/ progressive-prescription. 1000$???

These glasses are ok. I wish they offered the non high bridge version in this style. Can't get a good fit. Returning.

They are okay they dont go live so that was the purpose of getting them

Version 2 no longer support livestreaming which was my initial interest in these. Otherwie theyre a fine pair of sunglasses