Customer Ratings & Reviews

this ring does it all to track better sleep without paying a subscription

Nice ring. Fits good. Easily connects to phone. Easy to charge with case.

Love it. Help track my sleeping. Very comfortable and the battery life is great.

I simply love this ring. It is a good revolution to technology

Nice look and design. Works well with my Samsung phone.

The Samsung Galaxy Ring is considered a good quality smart ring with decent health tracking capabilities.

It was very nice ring and Best Buy refurbished program is amazing also ring was clean just like new

WORKS AWESOME! After some research I was looking for a smart ring and when Samsung came out with this, I was so excited and have not been disappointed.

Good quality and the battery works for a week util i need recharge

Does exactly what I needed it to do. Sleak and comfortable

Amazing quality, very light. Perfect companion to the galaxy watch 6 classic. Does it all

I would rate this 0 stars uf possible. I bought this so i could wear my good watches and count my steps, and almost exactly after 1 year it no longer stays connected to my phone. It essentially useless. I have tried rebooting, resetting it, updating firmware, etc. It will only stay connected if it sits in the case. The moment i put it on it will disconnect within seconds and then not reconnect until i put it back in the case. I have never damaged it. Samsung will only look at it for $100. Then no guarantees that it will stay working. Also battery life is not great. It drains within a day. I should have bought the Oura.

Awesome wearable. Only downside is if you lose it it's difficult to fine since it doesnt have a speaker built in.

This wa a great gift for my husband to get track of his daily steps! Plus, he only has to charge it one a week!

This open-box purchase was in perfect condition and ready for pickup super fast when I ordered online. The ring itself is good - I'm glad I opted for Galaxy vs Oura, but I'm also glad I got it half-price by buying open-box, because I don't think the data and insights provided by the tech is worth the $400 samsung is charging new.

Well, I just finished conducting a test experiment using the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra as well as the Samsung Galaxy Ring to determine the accuracy of this technology. Here are the results: 1. Television Activity: Burned 193 calories, with an average heart rate of 58 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 80 bpm over a span of 30 minutes and 9 seconds. 2. Video Game Activity: Burned 194 calories, with an average heart rate of 62 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 90 bpm over 30 minutes and 11 seconds. 3. Decree Session: Burned 193 calories, with an average heart rate of 69 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 77 bpm over 30 minutes and 11 seconds. 4. Circuit Training: Burned 297 calories, with an average heart rate of 131 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 155 bpm over 30 minutes and 17 seconds. When compared to this morning's decree session—which burned 700 calories with an average heart rate of 65 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 106 bpm over a span of 1 hour, 48 minutes, and 15 seconds—the findings seem consistent. Breaking that session into three 30-minute increments shows an average of about 200 calories burned per 30 minutes, equating to 600 calories over 90 minutes. Adding the remaining 18 minutes contributes roughly another 100 calories, aligning with the 700-calorie result. If extended to a full two hours, the calorie count would likely reach 800. This consistency across television, video gaming, and decree activities suggests no further experimentation is needed. It makes sense that 700 calories were burned during the morning decree session—not because of increased physical, mental, or emotional exertion but likely due to how the Samsung Galaxy Watch computes data. It appears the calorie estimates rely on predefined assumptions combined with sensor data, raising questions about the technology's accuracy. The concern now shifts to evaluating the precision of the device in measuring calories burned, heart rate, and other metrics. The only element that can be deemed nearly 100% accurate is time, as it is straightforward to compute. However, the calorie burn calculations invite skepticism. For example: 1. Watching television while seated resulted in burning approximately 200 calories. 2. Playing video games, which engages the mind and hands more actively, produced almost identical results. 3. A decree session, involving more intentional mental, emotional, and physical engagement, also yielded a similar calorie burn. 4. Circuit training, a highly intensive physical activity including weightlifting, calisthenics, and jumping jacks, only burned about 100 calories more than these sedentary activities. This discrepancy is striking. Despite the substantial physical demands of circuit training, the reported calorie burn difference is minimal. Even with efforts to maintain an elevated heart rate by limiting breaks during circuit training, the results suggest only a marginal improvement compared to less active pursuits. These findings raise significant doubts about the accuracy of the device's calorie and heart rate tracking capabilities. While the circuit training results seem plausible given the effort involved, the similarity in calorie burns across vastly different activities suggests that the device's algorithms may rely heavily on predetermined or generalized data rather than precise measurements. Further scrutiny of the technology's methodology is necessary to understand and address these inconsistencies.

Best anniversary gift for wife. Very useful for her health monitoring.

Great tracking and pairs well with flagship samsung phones.

i like how it feels premium and since its a ring it doesnt get in the way unlike a watch

Having the ring for over a year now, and the battery lasts overnight and zeroes out. My wife has an Oura, and while she has had it for over 2 years now, it still gets a couple of days battery life. Consider a smart watch instead as the last i had gave years of use before battery toasted out