Customer Ratings & Reviews

It is a great product. It is accurate and feels good in the hand. The main problem is that it is only for Android

Bought this as a gift for my husband. It truly helps to record his vitals and has an easy to use application.

This is definitely a want and not a need purchase. Its cool to have but really doesn't do enough. I personally bought it to better monitor my physical activity.

I love it, shows my sleep, steps etc. Only thing I didn't realize is that it needs to be charged pretty often.

This is a neat little device. I know some people probably wonder does this device overlap with the watch and it does without feeling like a waste of money. When you need to let your watch charge overnight or forget it, the ring won't miss a beat once its sensors adjust to you. Its also better than the competition, because no subscription. I got this for my wife so she likes that it tracks whenever she isnt wearing her watch. And the ring case doubles as a charger that can hold 2 or 3 charges on its own.

Love this product, as it’s perfect for my needs. It’s comfortable, has a long battery life, and provides awesome feedback. Exactly what I was looking for. I researched different wearables for a while and decided to go with the Samsung ring, as it syncs easily with my Samsung phone and I don’t like wearing things on my wrist.

I purchase this ring almost a year ago to the day on original purchase had great charge this is your warning one year later it will only stay charged for about 4 hours before needing to be recharged again can't even make it through a whole night sleep which is what I bought it for Samsung will do nothing about it Best Buy will do nothing about it

Well, I just finished conducting a test experiment using the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra as well as the Samsung Galaxy Ring to determine the accuracy of this technology. Here are the results: 1. Television Activity: Burned 193 calories, with an average heart rate of 58 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 80 bpm over a span of 30 minutes and 9 seconds. 2. Video Game Activity: Burned 194 calories, with an average heart rate of 62 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 90 bpm over 30 minutes and 11 seconds. 3. Decree Session: Burned 193 calories, with an average heart rate of 69 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 77 bpm over 30 minutes and 11 seconds. 4. Circuit Training: Burned 297 calories, with an average heart rate of 131 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 155 bpm over 30 minutes and 17 seconds. When compared to this morning's decree session—which burned 700 calories with an average heart rate of 65 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 106 bpm over a span of 1 hour, 48 minutes, and 15 seconds—the findings seem consistent. Breaking that session into three 30-minute increments shows an average of about 200 calories burned per 30 minutes, equating to 600 calories over 90 minutes. Adding the remaining 18 minutes contributes roughly another 100 calories, aligning with the 700-calorie result. If extended to a full two hours, the calorie count would likely reach 800. This consistency across television, video gaming, and decree activities suggests no further experimentation is needed. It makes sense that 700 calories were burned during the morning decree session—not because of increased physical, mental, or emotional exertion but likely due to how the Samsung Galaxy Watch computes data. It appears the calorie estimates rely on predefined assumptions combined with sensor data, raising questions about the technology's accuracy. The concern now shifts to evaluating the precision of the device in measuring calories burned, heart rate, and other metrics. The only element that can be deemed nearly 100% accurate is time, as it is straightforward to compute. However, the calorie burn calculations invite skepticism. For example: 1. Watching television while seated resulted in burning approximately 200 calories. 2. Playing video games, which engages the mind and hands more actively, produced almost identical results. 3. A decree session, involving more intentional mental, emotional, and physical engagement, also yielded a similar calorie burn. 4. Circuit training, a highly intensive physical activity including weightlifting, calisthenics, and jumping jacks, only burned about 100 calories more than these sedentary activities. This discrepancy is striking. Despite the substantial physical demands of circuit training, the reported calorie burn difference is minimal. Even with efforts to maintain an elevated heart rate by limiting breaks during circuit training, the results suggest only a marginal improvement compared to less active pursuits. These findings raise significant doubts about the accuracy of the device's calorie and heart rate tracking capabilities. While the circuit training results seem plausible given the effort involved, the similarity in calorie burns across vastly different activities suggests that the device's algorithms may rely heavily on predetermined or generalized data rather than precise measurements. Further scrutiny of the technology's methodology is necessary to understand and address these inconsistencies.

Must buy wow wow wow wow wowwow wow wowwoww ful data

I love my ring. I can get my phone to take remote pictures by pinching my fingers together, it keeps track of my steps even when I don't have my watch or phone with me and it tells me how my sleep and breathing were. My ring stays charged for a long time and when I do charge it, it's ready to go very quickly. I'm still learning more about how to use it, but I'm very happy with this purchase.

Works as intended even if i dont agree with some of the readings

Great addition for a smart ring but would be nice to have a few more features that newer rings are providing like BP and glucose monitoring.

Not for everyone, but if you are looking for a convient, comfortable way to track your sleep, this ring is for you.

Overall positive. Still in early phases of use and chosen due to current ecosystem of devices. Good battery life, great integration, Still unclear on some of the biometrics and overall look and feel is very good.

Pricey but was able to grab it during a sale, got $100. off

I love i track everything on this ring Very durable

The galaxy ring has aided my health program. I like it.

I bought this ring in September of 24' as gift to myself and it was fine at first . After 7 months it is not holding a charge for more then a day and is constantly losing connection. I have to charge this ring ever night and even after that it losing battery power and my connection which result in inaccurate sleep data.

This ring has been great so far. I've been able to measure my sleep and get so much data about my health! Highly recommended!

Deserves zero stars. Battery lasts 6-7 days until 10 months in and the battery suddeny starts dieing with no warning in about 30 hours. Contact warranty services and they tell me it's out of warranty. Website says 12 month warranty. Agent says nope, out of warranty but you can send it in to be checked out for $107.00 but repairs are extra. Do they train their agents to lie to customers?