1-4 of 4 Answers
Hello, the difference is the length of the cable. The first one is 1 meter (3ft, 4in) in length, the second one is 2 meters (6ft, 6in) in length.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Personally, I purchased a similar cable 9ft for $49.99 . The installer who I know and trust explained a few things to me that led me to return my expensive cable. 1.Quality, sure there are differences. 2. HDMI 2.0 is handled at the TV, Audio Receiver or DVD Player. 3. Most 4K TV's only have 1 HDR compatible input. 4. Even with a "high speed" or "ethernet compatible" HDMI cable, you aren't going to connect the TV to your home network via HDMI. 5. 12-15FT is about the longest cable you can/should use for 4K/HDR. And here is the kicker, there is so much mark up in these "fancy" cables, you can buy 4 or more "basic" cables and unless your entire system is high end (TV, UHD Player, short cable runs, and true 4K content)......spending $69 on a cable is wasteful. I used to work at a Audio/Video chain for 5 years. I only purchased the more expensive cable so I didn't buy the store brand. Some research online will direct you to good quality cables at 30% or less than the price.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.the length is the only difference as long as the colors are the same... the 6.6 and the 3.3 are the measurements.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.AudioQuest - Cinnamon 3-2/7' HDMI Cable - Black/Red I GOT THE 3 ITS 3 FEET LONG I RETURNED AND GOT THE 6 IS THE 6 FOOT THERE ARE DIFFERENT COLORS AND DIFFERENT QUALITYS THEY CARRY THE SIGNAL BETTER THEY CAN B COSTLY BUT YOUR GETTING WHAT YOU PAY FOR ,IF YOUR SPENDING BUCKS ON A TV THESE CABLES ARE GOLD JUST GET A IDEA HOW LONG YOU NEED AND KEP IN MIND ANY FUTURE RELOCATIONS OF YOUR BOXES
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
