1-2 of 2 Answers
The reply to this question is unhelpful. Obviously, the LAW requires JBL to put this warning on its packaging. WHY? What is the data that indicates there may be a problem linked to reproductive health??? I am sure everyone knows about the article in Medium in Feb 2020 that references 247 scientists from 42 countries expressing their concern about the health effects associated with exposure to the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted from wireless devices. In the following article from Healthline, https://www.healthline.com/health-news/are-wireless-headphones-dangerous#What-exactly-is-electromagnetic-radiation?, which seems to be balanced in its perspective, Dr. Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, the Director of the Center for Family Health at University of California, Berkeley, states => “If one uses the AirPods many hours a day, the cumulative exposure to the brain from this microwave radiation could be substantial,” Moskowitz stated on his website. Bottom-line, manufacturers have an obligation to be honest and clear with their consumers otherwise you are going to lose our trust. After seeing this reply, I decided I had to start doing my own research after seeing the label on the headphones I just gave my teenager. Teenagers especially should be aware of these concerns.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.There's nothing to worry about as our products are tested and safe. Proposition 65 requires businesses to provide warnings to Californians about significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm. If you have further questions, please contact us through this link: http://bit.ly/2lIab0A
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
