Which Roku model is this comparable to - Roku 1, 2, 3 or 4? null

better than the roku 3 in my opinion for a lower cost. the roku 4 is more for 4k.

It is probably most comparable to the Roku2. It gives you HD content through an HDMI, but is not controllable through a universal remote like the Roku3, and is not capable of 4K content like the Roku4, nor does it have an optical audio output.

It should be closest to the 3 in terms of features and speed. You only miss the optical audio out, the wired network and the headphone out on the remote.

The 2016 stick is most comparable to the Roku 4. It has the same quad core processor as Roku 4, and the interface is just as fast except Roku 4 has ability to stream 4K and has an Ethernet port. Nevertheless, the streaming quality still looks really good for the stick connected to my 4K tv.

2016 model is comparable to roku 4 in speed and roku 1 with price more info on rokus site

anything but the 1 which seems to be the older design. The stick has a wifi remote like the 3 and 4, but no headphones or gaming on it. Feature-wise, they are all the same, except for things like private listening. On the 3 and 4 you use the jack on the remote. On the stick you use the mobile app. this is not available on the 1 or 2 models.

For speed and apps I would compare it to the Roku 2. For features similar to the Roku 1. The Rokus 2-4 have ethernet plug in. Like the Roku 1 the streaming stick does not.

“Which Roku model is this comparable to - Roku 1, 2, 3 or 4?”

Asked by BigBlue56 9 years ago

Answer This Question

See all questions & answers

Roku - Streaming Stick (2016 Model) - Black-Front_Standard

1-10 of 10 Answers

better than the roku 3 in my opinion for a lower cost. the roku 4 is more for 4k.
Answered by Mrolivarez3 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
Roku 3. Just as fast.
Answered by cblkw 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
I think they are the same.
Answered by Pauley1977 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
It is probably most comparable to the Roku2. It gives you HD content through an HDMI, but is not controllable through a universal remote like the Roku3, and is not capable of 4K content like the Roku4, nor does it have an optical audio output.
Answered by MNMotorcycleGuy 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
2
Answered by bdsnooks 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
It should be closest to the 3 in terms of features and speed. You only miss the optical audio out, the wired network and the headphone out on the remote.
Answered by Bruce 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
The 2016 stick is most comparable to the Roku 4. It has the same quad core processor as Roku 4, and the interface is just as fast except Roku 4 has ability to stream 4K and has an Ethernet port. Nevertheless, the streaming quality still looks really good for the stick connected to my 4K tv.
Answered by unctarheel22 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
2016 model is comparable to roku 4 in speed and roku 1 with price more info on rokus site
Answered by rob2015 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
anything but the 1 which seems to be the older design. The stick has a wifi remote like the 3 and 4, but no headphones or gaming on it. Feature-wise, they are all the same, except for things like private listening. On the 3 and 4 you use the jack on the remote. On the stick you use the mobile app. this is not available on the 1 or 2 models.
Answered by CommunityAnswer 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
For speed and apps I would compare it to the Roku 2. For features similar to the Roku 1. The Rokus 2-4 have ethernet plug in. Like the Roku 1 the streaming stick does not.
Answered by JManTX68 9 years ago
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.