Customer Ratings & Reviews

I love the watch. It has been a great upgrade from the Fitbit. Its very easy to setup, to your Samsung phone. The battery lasts from two to four days.

After owning a couple different brands I found this to be extremely useful product. From the sleep monitoring to the medication conflict notification, to the just immense ability to customize you options. Now as a intense user the battery life could be a little better , I charge every couple days but doesn’t take long and I can live with it

I wish the battery lasted a bit longer. The face is a jice size.

The watch is beautiful. I bought it for my husband for Christmas and he loves it.

Samsung galaxy ultra watch Excellent watch 100% recommend

The watch is easy to use with many features not found on others. Great looking and works very well.

Great quality. The watch has a large interface that suits my dad's wrist. Color of this watch was amazing. Love it so far!

This is a great watch with all the options that ypu want!!

Bought it for my grandpa as a birthday gift to help keep track of his heart rate since he has a Samsung phone. He likes it and it’s stylish.

Absolutely Awesome Watch! Moved to it from a Frontier 3. The battery life is PERFECT!!

Great buy, love the style and functionality! Good variety of bands..

Excellent watch - Bought it for a present for my husband - he loves it!

This was a great gift for my wife who also owns a samsung phone. The 1 thing I wish is a beter strap to come with the watch as purchased, other than that it is cool

Great watch. I like the bigger band and larger face.

it was great! screen is big, and color is unique..

Great watch! My boyfriend was excited and loves it

It is great. My only complaint is that you have to have a watch line to use it.

Well, I just finished conducting a test experiment using the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra as well as the Samsung Galaxy Ring to determine the accuracy of this technology. Here are the results: 1. Television Activity: Burned 193 calories, with an average heart rate of 58 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 80 bpm over a span of 30 minutes and 9 seconds. 2. Video Game Activity: Burned 194 calories, with an average heart rate of 62 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 90 bpm over 30 minutes and 11 seconds. 3. Decree Session: Burned 193 calories, with an average heart rate of 69 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 77 bpm over 30 minutes and 11 seconds. 4. Circuit Training: Burned 297 calories, with an average heart rate of 131 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 155 bpm over 30 minutes and 17 seconds. When compared to this morning's decree session—which burned 700 calories with an average heart rate of 65 bpm and a maximum heart rate of 106 bpm over a span of 1 hour, 48 minutes, and 15 seconds—the findings seem consistent. Breaking that session into three 30-minute increments shows an average of about 200 calories burned per 30 minutes, equating to 600 calories over 90 minutes. Adding the remaining 18 minutes contributes roughly another 100 calories, aligning with the 700-calorie result. If extended to a full two hours, the calorie count would likely reach 800. This consistency across television, video gaming, and decree activities suggests no further experimentation is needed. It makes sense that 700 calories were burned during the morning decree session—not because of increased physical, mental, or emotional exertion but likely due to how the Samsung Galaxy Watch computes data. It appears the calorie estimates rely on predefined assumptions combined with sensor data, raising questions about the technology's accuracy. The concern now shifts to evaluating the precision of the device in measuring calories burned, heart rate, and other metrics. The only element that can be deemed nearly 100% accurate is time, as it is straightforward to compute. However, the calorie burn calculations invite skepticism. For example: 1. Watching television while seated resulted in burning approximately 200 calories. 2. Playing video games, which engages the mind and hands more actively, produced almost identical results. 3. A decree session, involving more intentional mental, emotional, and physical engagement, also yielded a similar calorie burn. 4. Circuit training, a highly intensive physical activity including weightlifting, calisthenics, and jumping jacks, only burned about 100 calories more than these sedentary activities. This discrepancy is striking. Despite the substantial physical demands of circuit training, the reported calorie burn difference is minimal. Even with efforts to maintain an elevated heart rate by limiting breaks during circuit training, the results suggest only a marginal improvement compared to less active pursuits. These findings raise significant doubts about the accuracy of the device's calorie and heart rate tracking capabilities. While the circuit training results seem plausible given the effort involved, the similarity in calorie burns across vastly different activities suggests that the device's algorithms may rely heavily on predetermined or generalized data rather than precise measurements. Further scrutiny of the technology's methodology is necessary to understand and address these inconsistencies.

The Galaxy Watch Ultra is the best watch I have ever owned. The customizations work to perfection and allow me to adjust accordingly. The health monitor for sleep and workouts is by far an incredible upgrade. I am constantly adapting and changing as my life changes. The watch and apps allow so many variables.

Best warch yet! It is so amazing and just what i needed.