1-4 of 4 Answers
This monitor is 1080p.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later."1080p" is a 16:9 native resolution of 1920x1080. 4K is also typically a 16:9 native resolution but 4x higher. This monitor is a 32:9 ultra-wide resolution, not 16:9. It's the equivalent of two 1080 16:9 monitors side by side. Its' native resolution is 3840x1080. "4K" being 4x1080 but still 16:9 is 3840x2160 resolution. So I guess you could say this monitor is the equivalent of half of a 4K display as two of them stacked and run in landscape mode with a capable graphics card for making it one big desktop would provide the equivalent of a 16:9 4K display with the monitor bezels across the center of the display image.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Actually, the more appropriate answer is that this monitor is half of 4K spread out horizontally meaning instead of being 1920x1080 regular 16:9 1080 HD or 3840x2160 16:9 "4K" it's a 3840x1080 32:9 monitor that's just like having two 16:9 1080 HD monitors side by side in landscape display mode or one above the other with both running in portrait mode. Stacking two of this monitor one above the other in landscape mode, if connected and set up properly, could be considered and would be displaying a total of 16:9 4K on most high end systems aside from the wide horizontal bezels of the two monitors being visible between the top and bottom halves of that 16:9 4K image. Some graphics cards and internal graphics don't support (can't do) the full 32:9 double-wide 3840x1080 native resolution of this monitor as one continuous single display. So a cool feature of this monitor for solving that problem is that it has 2 HDMI and 1 DP input and if your graphics card won't do the full 3840x1080 resolution you can connect 2 monitor ports from your graphics card to this monitor, enable the "PBP" (Picture By Picture) dual inputs side by side mode as if it were two 16:9 1080 monitors sitting side by side on your desk but without a bezel in between the two 16:9 displays for one seamless continuous horizontal 32:9 dual-display desktop image. Another thing I like about that is maximizing a window only fills one 16:9 display which leaves the other half of the screen still available for desktop visibility like when you have 2 separate 16:9 1080 monitors. This is extremely handy for when you have toolbars you want visible beyond your main window. There is also a 1/3-2/3 split (or 2/3-1/3, menu selectable) dual-display PBP menu option with odd resolutions which would give you a wider than 16:9 workspace (2560x1080) and narrower than 16:9 (1280x1080) space (closer to 4:3) for toolbars if you really want a wider primary display space for spreadsheets and such without maximize always filling the entire screen. Oh, and the PBP feature also has the ability to do 1/3-1/3-1/3 triple-display for connecting and viewing all 3 monitor inputs simultaneously as a continuous desktop screen but at an odd resolution (1280x1080) that's closer to having three 4:3 displays which could prove useful in certain user setups. BUT in any of those PBP modes if you're using a single PC with multiple monitor cables connected to this monitor you can still stretch any single window all the way across the entire screen for one full seamless 3840x1080 image window on this monitor. One detail that may matter to some users is that the PBP modes require running the Windows display settings for each monitor "display" (each cable connection) at 60hz.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Both
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.