1-5 of 5 Answers
They're about the same size so that shouldn't be much of an issue. The HR2 has a much higher build quality. My original HR got the dreaded air bubble issue where the glue holding the strap down failed and a large bubble appeared in the strap. Within a year's time, it had fallen apart. The HR2 doesn't suffer from the same problem and I'm enjoying it much more. The HR2 also has a larger display - I'm able to show time, date, and steps all on one screen on mine.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I'm not much taller than you - 5'3". I really like the Fitbit Charge 2. It's not too big on my wrist and has most of the features of the HR/HR2. Unless you really want GPS built in, the Charge 2 is worth consideration.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I think the Fitbit 2 is wider, and both can due the time. I think the 2 will be the better one cause the band always separated from display fitbit HR.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I like the HR2 with the touch display, though it's not as sensitive as I'd like. It's probably about the same width as the HR, definitely smaller than most watches.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.The Charge 2 surpasses the Charge/Charge HR in every way. In fact, comparing the two, the new one is slightly narrower than the first, but the display now takes up the whole face, instead of a small portion of it, so the new one appears larger, even if it isn't. You can even change bands on the new one.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
