1-10 of 10 Answers
I had the Charge HR and opted to go with the Surge. I needed a larger face. It does a better job of tracking heart rate due to the wider band.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.GPS. That is the only added benefit or extra of the surge. I wanted a fitbit with a heart rate monitor and i ended up choosing the Surge just because of the GPS . My suggestion is , if you don't need a GPS save yourself some money and get the Charge HR.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.GPS, Exercise, treadmill, hike, run, bike options. Bigger screen. Would never go back to the Fibit HR from the Surge.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.It has the hardware to do multiple sport modes where as the charge hr is primarily for runners
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.For me it's the GPS and that it will sync to your music it will also alert you to your text messages and phone xalls
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.None that I know of. Not as a comparison to the HR, but I just don't think it is nearly worth the cost.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I like the different program modes you can put the surge in that aren't available with the charge. I also like the bigger watch face.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.This one has both heart rate and GPS. Fitbit Charge HR doesn't have GPS, so if you're a runner and want to keep track of your runs it's the best of both worlds.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I dont feel there are features that support the cost differential. I think if you want HR go with a ChargeHR. you get the monitoring but you get a smaller more manageable package.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Yes
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
