1-4 of 4 Answers
Samsung 970 PRO uses latest Samsung 64-layer 3D MLC V-NAND whereas the Samsung 970 EVO uses Samsung 64-layer 256Gb 3D TLC. Both use the same Samsung Phoenix NAND controller. 970 PRO is a little faster for sequential and random writes and uses a little less power. Here's a link to a comparison: https://www.anandtech.com/show/12674/samsung-announces-970-pro-and-970-evo-nvme-ssds There is also a new 970 EVO Plus which utilizes a burst write buffer to improve write performance for most application that produce bursts of write but not sustained writes. Here's a link to performance comparison of all 970s. https://www.pcworld.com/article/3334876/computers/samsung-970-evo-plus-review-samsungs-entry-level-nvme-ssd-is-faster-and-cheaper.html
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.price and hours before it is meant to fail
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Google is your friend - didn't want to answer incorrectly, so pulled the following from a thread on that search: "The Pro versions have better endurance, they are backed by a double amount of terrabytes written warranty, for example 600 TBW on the 512gb Pro, against a 300 TBW on the 'regular' EVO 970 (both have 5 year warranty). If you're not a professional heavy user that can justify this difference the 'regular' 970 EVO should be the right choice, but if you somehow manage to write over 160gb everyday day (which is what you need to reach 300TBW in 5 years), you might consider the pro version. The Pro has a slightly faster speed and a faster sustained speed. MLC vs TLC NAND. When copy large amounts of data, the EVO speed will drop down. The Pro should sustain better throughout." Hope this helps!
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Just a little bit performance upgrade instead of 3400 max sequential its 3500 for pro
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
