1-2 of 2 Answers
Accoding the this review: http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2016/02/garmins-vivoactivehr-vivofit3.html Quote from link: However, while it’s the same underlying display, they have tweaked some aspects to improve contrast. Also remember that while the display may be the same, factors like the touch screen which sits atop the display have changed – and that actually does impact visual qualities of the display below it. In this case, they changed the touch screen to a component that’s faster and more response, as well as improving the look of the display below it. Additionally, they added an ambient light sensor, so that the display’s brightness will change dynamically based on lighting conditions. Said differently: It just seems more crisp than the original Vivoactive. Quote End.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.The display quality is horrible. If you are over the age of 45, and unless you want to bring your reading glasses with you, it is useless.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
