1-6 of 6 Answers
This is the Motion Rate. It is a combination of refresh rate and a backlight refresh rate. Meaning that the 120 is really a 60Hz screen with a backlight that flickers at 120z to try to trick the eye. In my opinion I have seen no annoying adverse effects of the 60z even with Blu-Ray that is designed for 120hz I was worried but I have been very happy and I am very critical.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.The difference between the two response rates is only noticeable in high speed video content such as racing, sports and fast paced action. If this is not content that will be watched then the price difference is not worth it but if these are the type of things that will be watched then it may be worth it to the end user to buy the more expensive model.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.It's for the motion rate. I have the 6700 and have had no issues with blurry motion. So in my opinion it is not worth the price differance.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.120 is 60hz. And was told that was why I was experiencing a choppy viewing experience with both of mine. I was not able to test the 240 (120hz) at home, but I would not recommend the motion rate 120 for a 4k TV, even if you are not watching sports.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.This tv has a refresh rate of 60. Don't be fooled by Samsung on this one. Go to CNET and look at their reviews before you buy anything. I had this tv for one day after going to cnet and looking at the real numbers I returned it.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Yes it's worth the cost
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
