1-9 of 9 Answers
should be the same or virtually the same as LG 43UJ6300. I bought the 43UJ6300 and it definitely has HDR. The HDR system used must be some variant on Dolby Vision as it analyzes HDR data screen by screen.. If you can get this '43UJ6200' (er.. 43UJ6300) for 279.00 I wouldn't worry a bit. It is a great TV and a screaming bargain at that price or even close to that price in my view. I saw both models on the LG Website.. I think they created a new part number for the same TV to allow for promo 'Black Friday' pricing. Same thing last year with the 43UH6030/ 43UH6100. Same TV, different part number and pricing. Samsung does the same stuff, maybe others. Buyers just need to pay close attention.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I called LG last night and asked that exact question. After a 10 minute wait they came back and said it was the exact same TV with a different stand. Apparently, the 6200 model's stand is a little bulky, so they slimmed it up and called it a 6300. Again, exact same TV, directly from LG. ... Following that call I went directly to bestbuy.com and bought that 6200, or as LG calls it, the UJ62, BOOYA! DEAL.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Based on the stock photos alone, the two have different side profiles and stand positions. This one has a narrower stand width (good if your TV console is not ultra wide). This one has a slimmer, angular side profile at the top while the other one has a more rounded back. Tech-wise, they appear to be identical.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Great discussion here everyone as I recently bought the 43UJ6300 as well. Looking at the owners manual from the LG product page, the stand design is inferior in my opinion to the 43UJ6300. Specifically the way the legs screw in. Is it worth the $50 price difference for me since I paid $329.99 about 10 days ago for it? No absolutely not, but the stand design on the 43UJ6300 seems more durable over the long run. It screws in from the bottom of the TV as opposed to the back like the 43UJ6200. I guess I can use that to tell myself it's not worth returning the 43UJ6300 for the 43UJ6200 and save $50.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.In the specs I see that the 6300 is Energy Star qualified while the 6200 is not, and the predicted energy consumption is $20/year for the 6200 but only $11/year for the 6300. However, it's possible that this is just due to differences in initial settings like screen brightness and "energy saver" modes; the actual efficiency might not be all that different.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.Those who were wondering about the 43uj6300 vs the 43uj6200 might take a moment to check specifications as listed regarding the wall mount, the 6200 is listed as 200mm x 200mm where as the 6300 mount is 300mm x 300mm, I would surmise that is an up grade to the rigidity of the mount.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.I nearly chose the 6300, but noticed significant differences in energy use (see spec list) between 6200 and 6300. A few dozen customers complained about screen brightness with a 6300 We often view in a bright room, so a brighter screened 6200 was the way to go for us. For me the other differences are slight.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.The 6200 is the older model (2017) and the 6300 the newer model (2018) I compared both and I virtually see no difference in specs. Just buy the cheaper of the two. They are pretty much the same TV only with a different number.
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.There are many specification difference between 6200 and 6300 ,.6200 is not have built in Bluetooth where as 6300 have it . And one more important difference I feel is 6200 doesn't have Magic Remote compatibility or not included ..But 6300 have that Magic Remote . I feel 6300 was a good buy even though it is $50 bugs more. Thanks VJ
Sorry, there was a problem. Please try again later.
