Overall
This has been a pretty amazing product. It’s simple to setup and requires little to no maintenance from the end user. It’s a good, and “cheaper”, WiFi system than all of its name brand competitors. A good system for the less tech savvy-parents, grandparents or anyone looking for something with a less hands on approach.
But first, for the sake of clarification, as I despise making any mention of competitor products or brands, I feel it is necessary in this case to further elaborate on some of its shortcomings I’ll mention further down. I have an existing 3 puck ubiquity WiFi system mounted to walls, ceilings or outside of the house making it time consuming to remove/disconnect. This makes for an environment that isn’t ideal for another WiFi system to be tested in.
With that out of the way lets dive right in.
Features
Motorola offers some solid features with their mesh WiFi. For starters, you get a neat and simple to understand dashboard that allows for several admin settings right from the dashboard. First, there’s an active list of currently connected devices. Clicking a device shows a recent history of services that device has connected to. You have security settings, which to be fair doesn’t give you much in terms of customization, just a green bar showing the numbers of threats it is looking out for. If a threat is found; Trojans, virus, etc. The green circle shifts to red which is clearly visible from the dashboard. A simple network filter with 3 toggles for filtering of known malicious sites, ad privacy filters, and an adult filter for adult oriented websites. For health of the network, there’s a simple to read connection manager showing the current status of the network. 6 individual check mark bubbles highlighting games, web, music, HD, SD, and 4K. I can only assume, as I haven’t experienced issues, that if you had a significant speed drop some of those bubbles will become red with an X.
Digging further deeper into the app you got your profiles settings, which I will add isn’t a part of the dashboard but a tab at the bottom of the screen. Setting up profiles gives you the ability to set time limits, schedules, or the aforementioned content filters (if you didn’t wish to apply those to the entire network but specific profiles).
A little more hidden under the settings tab, usually settings that the average user won’t ever have to mess with. You got your port forwarding and upnp. But a little less common, and mostly exclusive to mesh systems, you got your auto optimization network settings that allows the toggle of a general location where this will be installed. The options range from “single occupant home” with a subtext that reads “few neighboring networks”, “Townhome” with “some WiFi networks”, and “apartment” with “many WiFi networks”. Basically these should tweek things such as channel width, beamforming, and transmit power but in a simple human readable format. Without having to look up the definition for every setting and having to trial and error every possible combination to find something that works for you. Although I couldn’t find any documentation about this so my assumption can be off by a bit.
Cons - Features
I don’t normally break these down per section but for this it seems more appropriate to detail any issues relating to the subject.
It may be a fluke but during my testing I couldn’t get the network filters to function correctly. After enabling all toggles, I attempted to visit an adult page and nothing prevented my visit. Adding my phone into a profile, I enabled the toggles for that profile and tried again. Once again, nothing prevented my visit. It’s worth mentioning, during setup, I used a network switch at the top of my network topology. But shortly after getting things working it failed resulting in only 1 port having connection access. I then had to daisy-chain it to my existing network, which put a pfsense gateway at the top. It’s entirely possible my existing setup is applying a filter on the stream. Going to a certain adult orientated website showed nothing in the history logs of the Motorola. But just like my history screenshot, other sites show up just fine.
Design
It’s a simple design, round and fairly small, roughly the size of a hand but about 2 inches tall. 2 Ethernet jacks on the back of each puck, which act as WAN and LAN. Any of the bridge pucks will result in 2 LAN jacks so you won’t lose any because of the picture at the base of the port. A type C USB port between the 2 and a pinhole reset button to the left. It’s simple and has a subtle design that won’t stick out like a sore thumb if you cannot hide it out of sight.
Performance
I can’t say this area was perfect but it did well enough. Using the onboard speed test on the puck it said I was getting what the pipeline was set for. Give or take 50mbps per test. Testing from my phone through any network speed testing site gave about the same result. Any browsing or streams I tried to run through it worked perfectly well.
After finalizing my thoughts, I did a survey and something seemed to be a general consensus between everyone else. These faced a slight performance drop. Nothing I can say I witnessed, but aside from my current WiFi system, I have nothing else to test against.
Cons - Performance
Although I mentioned it worked well enough for me, one thing that soured me was a significant range issue. As mentioned at the very start, I couldn’t test 1 system at a time by shutting it off and testing so I placed the Motorola pucks in different rooms trying to separate them from my current WiFi. That resulted in a fairly short range. The packaging rates these as good for up to a 4500 sqft area. But in a 1800 sqft location, these had significant range issues. One of the most noticeable locations I did a comparison was the backyard, where I do not have any exterior mounted WiFi devices. This was a more fair area to test both systems having interface from each other. Several feet from the back door resulted in multiple dropped connections while other times I had a false connection. WiFi showing connected but either abysmal or a non-existent internet connection.
Other Considerations
I didn’t realize this in the beginning, mainly because I just clicked agree to everything as I setup. But for those who are concerned about privacy, MINIM isn’t exactly a part of Motorola. MINIM is the software company that provides the app and from my research isn’t part of Motorola. My initial thoughts were that this was a software subsidiary of it but it doesn’t appear that way. After skimming through it, I can’t say with certainty if this data is shared between both entities.
Conclusion
This is a great system nonetheless. It makes everything simple for the end user and provides a good connection. And when compared to other mesh systems, this one comes out as a, financially, cheaper option from the big names. Just be aware of the data that's collected.