I've used the Linksys Velop Tri Band System for the last 15 days. I recently tried out the Linksys Velop Dual band system (Model WHW0103 – also available at Best Buy) and decided to see what the Tri-Band version had to offer. Much like the dual band system I haven't had any issues using the Mesh system. So far, I have been happy with the performance of the Tri Band system. My house is 1700 sqft split between 2 stories, and an attached garage. I have gone through and performed a couple of network benchmarks and random tests to see how the Tri-band performs, and how it differs from the Dual-band.
The Tri Band Velop Mesh System (3 pack)
The system comes with 3 separate nodes – a primary tower and 2 plug-in nodes that resemble wall-warts. The primary node is an AC2200 router (2 bands of 867Mbps @ 5Ghz, 400 Mbps @ 2.4Ghz) with simultaneous tri-band radios and MU-MIMO. The other 2 nodes are AC1300 routers (867 Mbps @ 5GHz, 400 Mbps @ 2.4GHz) with simultaneous dual band radios and MU-MIMO. MU-MIMO allows multiple WiFi users to communicate with the router simultaneously without taking the performance hit - this is the latest and greatest router technology until 802.11ax gets fully released in 2019. Each plug-in node packs 3 antennas and amplifiers. The primary tower has 6 antennas and amplifiers, as well as 2 ethernet ports (for WAN or LAN use). Along with the nodes the pack comes with a single ethernet cable (its not marked, so I assume cat5e) and a power adapter. The operating temperature range for the Velop routers is 32° to 104°F – for anyone looking to deploy these in a garage setting.
Setup, just like I experienced with the dual band, is pretty easy. You need an Android or IOS device to download the Linksys app to do the setup. I started with the setup of the main tower (based on the quick start sheet in the box), and from there the app gave me instructions going forward. The main tower was setup without an issue. I did run into 1 issue with each of the plug-in nodes. For whatever reason each node had to be reset (with the button on the side) before the app would pair with it and setup. The same situation happened when I setup my dual band system, so maybe this is an issue with the router/app/or my phone. Who knows? In any case the app will eventually suggest that you reset the node after failing to pair a couple of times. Once the first plug-in node is setup and connected the app will prompt you to add another. Follow the same steps again and the system is up and running. Once they are all setup the mesh network forms one contiguous wireless field that has a single Wifi name and password. You seamlessly switch between nodes as you move about your house with your device. There's no drop in coverage before the next beacon picks you up.
Unlike the Dual Band system I have, the secondary nodes of the Tri-band cannot be setup as wireless backhauls (i.e. wired via ethernet to the primary node to pump out a full speed signal) since they lack the necessary LAN ports. They can only act as repeaters that boost the primary nodes signal to create the mesh. The loss of this functionality is compensated by the strength of the primary node’s signal, and the ability to more easily locate the nodes. I was able to locate a plug-in node in my foyer (the midpoint of my house between the primary and furthest out node), which was a place that I couldn’t locate my dual band tower. This allowed for better placement of the nodes to more adequately create the mesh.
Tri-Band vs. Dual Band
The biggest difference between the 2 versions of the Velop, that I have used, is the single Tri-Band tower that comes with this kit. The other 2 nodes function as dual band AC1300 plug-in routers. The Dual Band system has 3 AC1300 tower routers, each with the same effective speed and range as the plug-in routers. The Tri-Band tower has a larger range due to the additional sets of antenna/amplifiers.
Speed wise, there shouldn’t be much difference between the 2 sets since the fastest radios each set carries is 867 Mbps @ 5 Ghz. What the Tri-band allows is more traffic to be handled due to its additional 5Ghz radio. In effect if the amount of devices, and traffic on your network, is great enough you can fully saturate a dual band signal and cause a drop in speed. The Tri-band, in this scenario, would keep chugging along at a higher speed since the 5Ghz traffic can be divided amongst the 2 radios. Think of it like a highway – 2 lane vs 3 lane.
For both systems, I hit 106 Mbps at 5 ft from the main node (speed test shows 116 for wired connections). I know my house falls well below the square footage for this setup (5000 sq ft). Like I did with the dual band, I disabled 2 of the nodes and tested speeds. I located the nodes from the 2 different systems in the same spots, to remove the variable of one system getting more favorable placement over the other. The lowest inside my house was 45 Mbps (Tri) and 40 (Dual), and the lowest overall being in my garage – 24 (Tri) and 18 (Dual). With 1 node disabled (the one closest to the garage) my house coverage was perfect and the lowest speeds inside the house was 65 (Tri) and 63 (Dual). The garage rating stayed pretty similar - 26 and 21. With all 3 nodes running the lowest in the house was 76 (Tri) and 72 (Dual) with the garage coming up to 58 and 53. The added range of the Tri-band router provides a small, but noticeable bump in performance for the further out connections.
Performance
I wanted to test the performance of the nodes so I booted up LAN Speed test from Totusoft and performed some dummy file transfers between my computers. My transfers went between 2 computers with NVME ssd drives. With the nodes and PC's fully wireless I ran the test with both PC’s connecting to the main node from 15 ft. I achieved 135 Mbps Up and 240 down. I would have though the Up/Down numbers would be the same with 2 NVME drives, but I guess not. Then I tried again with the PC's connected to 2 separate nodes – both at 15 ft their respective nodes, and another 20 ft between each node. I hit 83 / 155 with this setup. That’s a decent drop in performance, but I was skipping across a couple of nodes to make that connection, so I expected some losses.
I also decided to load up my network with wireless traffic on the 2 different Velop systems to see how much more traffic the Tri-band could handle. I had music streaming on my Sonos, Netflix on my Xbox and Roku (1080p), Netflix on a laptop (4K), Youtube on a Chromebook (1080p), Hulu on my PC (1080p), and a Steam Download. For both systems I had QoS rules in place to prioritize traffic to the laptop, Xbox, and PC. On the Dual band system none of my video streams experienced any buffering or stuttering, but the Steam download speed was pretty low – 22 Mbps (105Mbps with no traffic). I loaded up all the same traffic on the Tri-Band, and again I did not experience any stuttering or buffering. However, the Steam download was hovering around 39Mbps – so a 77% boost in the Steam download speed. I know that may not seem like a big difference, but this was all the traffic that I could drum up as an individual. Households with several users could easily match this much traffic, and more on a daily basis. This would eventually lead to stuttering/buffering on the Dual band, while the Tri-band would chug along.
Reliability
A central part of the Velop Mesh system is its ability to self heal if a node goes down. If one node drops, all traffic going through that node automatically shifts to the next closest node without you noticing. That is unless the node you are connected to is the last one in a daisy chain of nodes. If that is the case you may be out of range for the rest of the mesh, but you would need to be pretty far away to fully lose the mesh. As long as the node connected to the router doesn't drop you really shouldn't lose internet and your WiFi network. I have kept a system uptime logger (like I did for the dual band) going on my PC and it has been 100% for the last 2 weeks. I played around with power cycling the nodes (unplug and plug back in) to see how quickly they would reacquire the mesh - it was right around 30-35 seconds (the same as the dual band). If a node drops, you get a push notification from the Linksys app on your phone telling you that a node has lot connection.
Interface
I said this in my review of the Dual Band system - the app interface is pretty slick and simple to navigate. This is no longer the router configuration of the old days. Some networking pros may cringe at the simplicity, but most folks just want their router to work without much effort needed. I have no issue looking at what devices are connected, what nodes they are connected to, and setting QoS rules.
Overall, I am very pleased with the performance of this Mesh system. This is the second Velop system I have tried out, and both have left me consistently happy with their performance. The plug-in nodes are easy to locate and setup while providing a stable connection. The range for the system is pretty good – greater than what I would truly need for my dwelling. However, during the warmer weather months I plan to relocate a node to my garage to expand my mesh outside (I have extra nodes with my dual band, so I might as well). I am very happy with the ease of setup and the app interface. I think It's really well thought out and easy to use. The design of the main node is a little modern and larger than its dual band counterpart, but it looks cool and monolithic. The plug-in nodes blend right into the wall and are barely noticeable, which I thin